Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-20 | 2016-09-29 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 295 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.44 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A01, with a 77 score against 71.6. LG V20 is an a lot older and somewhat heavier cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A01, but LG made it just a little thinner anyway. Galaxy A01 features a bit superior processing unit than LG V20, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with more processing cores.
LG V20 counts with a better screen than Galaxy A01, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the LG V20 also has a way better screen pixels density and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. LG V20 captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a bigger camera sensor, a much better 3840x2160 video resolution, a better 16 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a bigger camera aperture to take better photos in poorly lited situations.
The LG V20 counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has 48 GB more internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V20 counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A01, because it has a 7% more battery capacity.
The LG V20 costs more than the Samsung Galaxy A01, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.