Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-20 | 2017-09-21 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.44 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V30 is better than Galaxy A01, getting a 79.1 score against 71.6. LG V30 is a notably older and just a bit heavier cellphone than Galaxy A01, but LG was able to make it thinner anyway. The LG V30 features a much better looking display than Galaxy A01, because it has a quite larger display, a lot higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and way more pixels per inch in the display.
The LG V30 features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A01, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V30 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The LG V30 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A01, because it has a much larger aperture, a much better video quality, a more megapixels back camera and a larger sensor.
LG V30 features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. LG V30 has just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A01, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Although LG V30 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A01. If you want to save some money, you can get Galaxy A01, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.