Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-20 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.44 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a global score of 83.7, which is much better than the Galaxy A01's 71.6 score. LG V50 ThinQ is a somewhat heavier device than the Galaxy A01, but they have the same thickness. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version while Galaxy A01 has Android 11.
LG V50 ThinQ features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A01, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The LG V50 ThinQ features a much better looking screen than Galaxy A01, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels, a little bigger display and a way greater screen pixel density.
LG V50 ThinQ has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has 112 GB more internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A01, because although it has a worse 12 MP resolution back camera, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video resolution, a way larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography and a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality.
The LG V50 ThinQ features improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A01, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
The LG V50 ThinQ is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A01, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.