Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-01-20 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.44 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A01, with a 77.9 score against 71.6. Even being the best in this comparison, Motorola DROID Turbo's body is notably older, heavier and noticeably thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A01. These phones use Android OS, but Motorola DROID Turbo has a more recent 4.4.4 version and Samsung Galaxy A01 has Android 11 version, so it counts with some additional features.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a much better screen than Galaxy A01, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a much better display pixels density. Galaxy A01 has a bit more storage to store more apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a little better performance than Galaxy A01, because although it has lesser cores , it also counts with more RAM and a graphics processing unit. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A01, because it has a 30 percent larger battery size.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a much better camera than Galaxy A01, because it has a way better (4K) video resolution, a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a bigger aperture to take better low light captures and videos.
Motorola DROID Turbo costs more money than Galaxy A01, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.