Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-01-20 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 100.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 295 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.44 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G Stylus is better than Samsung Galaxy A01, having a 79.7 score against 71.6. Although it's the best in our current comparison, Motorola Moto G Stylus's construction is way heavier and a bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A01. These devices use the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus features just a little better performance than Galaxy A01, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Moto G Stylus counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A01, because it has more pixels per inch in the screen, a lot better 1080 x 2300 resolution and a little bit bigger display.
Moto G Stylus features a way better camera than Galaxy A01, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 video quality, a much better resolution back camera, a lot larger diafragm aperture and a much larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors. The Moto G Stylus features a superior memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A01, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Moto G Stylus also has 112 GB more internal storage.
The Moto G Stylus has improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a 33% larger battery capacity.
Although Moto G Stylus is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A01. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy A01, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.