Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-20 | 2019-06-06 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.44 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto Z4 is much better than Galaxy A01, having a 79.8 score against 71.6. Even though the Moto Z4 and the Galaxy A01 were only released with a few months difference, Moto Z4's body is just a bit heavier but also somewhat thinner than the Galaxy A01. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android OS, but the Moto Z4 has the older 10 version and Galaxy A01 has Android 11 version.
Moto Z4 features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A01, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Moto Z4 also has more RAM memory. Motorola Moto Z4 has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a little larger screen, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a better screen density.
The Motorola Moto Z4 has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A01, and although they both have an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has more internal memory capacity. The Moto Z4 counts with better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a 20 percent greater battery size.
Moto Z4 counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a way bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way larger diafragm aperture to take better photography and video in low-light environments, a camera in the back with much more megapixels and a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Although Motorola Moto Z4 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A01. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Motorola Moto Z4, else you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A01, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.