Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-20 | 2018-08-24 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.44 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 has a global score of 87.1, which is way better than the Galaxy A01's global score of 71.6. Although it's the best phone in this comparison, the Galaxy Note9 is an older, way heavier and just a little thicker phone than Galaxy A01. The Galaxy Note9 counts with a much better screen than Galaxy A01, because it has way more pixels per inch in the display, a quite larger display and a lot better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
The Galaxy Note9 has much more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A01, and although they both have an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy Note9 also has more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A01, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note9 features a better camera than Galaxy A01, because although it has a worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much higher (4K) video quality and a lot larger aperture to capture better low light captures and videos.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 features longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy Note9 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A01. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A01, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.