Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-20 | 2018-10-17 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.44 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ3 is better than the Galaxy A01, having a 79.6 score against 71.6. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Xperia XZ3 has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy A01 has Android 11 version, so it gives lots of additional features and increased performance. Despite being the best cellphone in our current comparison, the Xperia XZ3 is an older, notably heavier and thicker cellphone than Galaxy A01.
The Xperia XZ3 counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy A01, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xperia XZ3 also has more RAM memory. The Sony Xperia XZ3 has a lot better display than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a quite bigger screen, way more pixels per inch in the screen and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
Xperia XZ3 features a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A01, and although they both have a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Xperia XZ3 also has 48 GB more internal memory. The Sony Xperia XZ3 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 video definition, a lot higher resolution back facing camera, a much larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs and videos and a larger aperture for better low light images.
The Sony Xperia XZ3 counts with just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a 3330mAh battery size.
Although Xperia XZ3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A01. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy A01, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.