Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-01-20 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| $ 100.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.44 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a general score of 77.8, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A01's 71.6 general score. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version while Samsung Galaxy A01 has Android 11. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a a lot newer and noticeably thinner device than Samsung Galaxy A01, although it is noticeably heavier.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A01, because it has a better screen pixels density, a much bigger display and a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution. Galaxy A01 features a much more powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A01, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 496 GB more internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy A01, because it has a lot larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos, a lot better resolution camera, a way larger sensor capturing way better quality videos and pictures and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better battery performance than Galaxy A01, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A01. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A01, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.