Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-20 | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 295 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.44 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a general score of 85.5, which is better than Samsung Galaxy A01's score of 71.6. Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than Samsung Galaxy A01, it must be noted that it's also older, just a little bit thicker and heavier. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A01, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a brighter display than Galaxy A01, because it has a bit larger screen, a higher pixels density and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2246px. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A01, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 240 GB more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A01, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better captures in poorly lited environments, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features longer battery duration than Galaxy A01, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A01, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A01. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy A01, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.