Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-04 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 has an overall score of 85, which is better than the Galaxy A02s's 74.5 overall score. Despite of the fact that Apple iPhone 8 is extremely older than Galaxy A02s, it's body is much lighter and somewhat thinner. The Apple iPhone 8 has a greater performance than Galaxy A02s, because although it has 2 less cpu cores and 1 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone 8 features a more vivid display than Galaxy A02s, because although it has a lot smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 750 x 1334 pixels, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density. Apple iPhone 8 counts with a bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A02s, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The iPhone 8 features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because although it has a back camera with less megapixels, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light situations and a way higher video definition. Galaxy A02s has a superior battery duration than iPhone 8, because it has a 175% larger battery size.
Although iPhone 8 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A02s, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A02s. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A02s, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.