Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-04 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS Max has a general score of 84.5, which is much better than Galaxy A02s's 74.5 overall score. Although Apple iPhone XS Max is noticeably older and just a bit heavier than the Galaxy A02s, it's body is still somewhat thinner. IPhone XS Max features a much sharper display than Galaxy A02s, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the iPhone XS Max also has a lot more pixels per inch of screen and a lot better 1242 x 2688 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A02s features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than iPhone XS Max, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. The iPhone XS Max has a quite better processing power than Galaxy A02s, because although it has 2 lesser processing cores , it also counts with more RAM and a 64 bits processor.
The Galaxy A02s has a really longer battery performance than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Apple iPhone XS Max has a better camera than Galaxy A02s, because although it has a worse resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video quality and a larger camera aperture.
Although Apple iPhone XS Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A02s, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A02s. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Apple iPhone XS Max, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy A02s, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.