Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-04 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is better than the Galaxy A02s, getting an 83.7 score against 74.5. These phones work with Android OS, but LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version and Galaxy A02s has Android 11 version. LG V50 ThinQ's design is a bit thinner and just a bit lighter than Galaxy A02s, despite of the fact that it was released only 20 months before.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A02s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The LG V50 ThinQ has a much better display than Galaxy A02s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher quantity of pixels per screen inch and a lot higher 1440 x 3120 resolution.
The LG V50 ThinQ shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy A02s, because although it has a camera in the back with lesser mega-pixels, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lot bigger aperture. The LG V50 ThinQ features a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A02s, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A02s counts with improved battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ is way more expensive than Galaxy A02s, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.