Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2021-01-04 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| $ 170.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a score of 77.8, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A02s's 74.5 score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version while Samsung Galaxy A02s has Android 11. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro construction is noticeably newer and extremely thinner, but heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A02s.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A02s, because it has a bigger display, a lot more pixels per screen inch and a much higher 2200 x 2480 resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy A02s features a very superior CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 13 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because it has a camera with a much higher resolution, a way larger aperture for better low-light captures and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A02s, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 5000mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy A02s, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A02s. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Galaxy A02s, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.