Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android | Android 14 |
| 2022-01-10 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| -- | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A03's 72.4 overall score. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with Android 14 operating system, and Galaxy A03 has Android operating system. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A03, because it has a way greater pixels number per inch in the screen, a bigger display and a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution.
The Galaxy A03 has a lot better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A03, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a greater camera than Galaxy A03, because it has a larger camera aperture and a back-facing camera with more MP.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A03, because it has a 5700mAh battery size against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.