Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-18 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and Blue. White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max has a global score of 84.5, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A03s's 74 overall score. Although iPhone XS Max is incredibly older and just a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy A03s, it's construction is still somewhat thinner. IPhone XS Max counts with a better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy A03s, because although it has less processing cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and more RAM memory.
IPhone XS Max features an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy A03s, and although they both have a same size display, the iPhone XS Max also has a much greater display pixel density and a much better resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels. Apple iPhone XS Max features a superior camera than Galaxy A03s, because although it has a camera in the back with less megapixels, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better images and video in low-light environments and a lot better (4K) video definition.
Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A03s, because it has 32 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A03s has a superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 57% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.