Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-18 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Blue. White | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A03s, having a 79.1 score against 74. The LG V30 design is lighter and somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy A03s, even though it was released many years before. The LG V30 features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A03s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a much better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
LG V30 counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A03s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30 also has a larger amount of RAM. LG V30 has a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A03s, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V30 captures better videos and photos than Galaxy A03s, because it has a lot better (4K) video quality, a much bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and videos in low light environments and a back camera with more megapixels. Samsung Galaxy A03s features a really longer battery performance than LG V30, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.