Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2019-03-19 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro has an overall score of 84.9, which is much better than Galaxy A10's score of 72.3. The iPhone 11 Pro is an a little bit thicker and heavier phone than Galaxy A10. The iPhone 11 Pro comes with iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy A10 has Android 11 OS. The iPhone 11 Pro counts with a lot better display than Galaxy A10, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a much better quantity of pixels per inch of display.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro features a better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has less CPU cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and 2 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A10 counts with a much better storage to install games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The iPhone 11 Pro takes better videos and photos than Galaxy A10, because although it has a lower 12 MP resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way higher video quality, a larger back-facing camera sensor and a larger aperture to take better low light photography and videos. The Samsung Galaxy A10 features a bit better battery life than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3046mAh.
Although iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A10. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A10, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.