Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-19 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 is much better than the Galaxy A10, having a overall score of 85 against 72.3. IPhone 8's construction is just a little thinner and somewhat lighter than the Galaxy A10, even though it was released just 18 months before. Apple iPhone 8 features a better looking screen than Galaxy A10, because although it has a quite lower 750 x 1334 resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel number in each inch of screen.
Apple iPhone 8 features a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A10, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. IPhone 8 counts with a faster processor than Galaxy A10, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have a 2 GB RAM, the iPhone 8 also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy A10 features a really longer battery performance than iPhone 8, because it has an 87% more battery capacity. IPhone 8 takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A10, because although it has a camera in the back with a worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality, a much higher video resolution and a larger aperture for better low light photos.
Although Apple iPhone 8 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A10. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone 8, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Galaxy A10, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.