Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-19 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max has an overall score of 84.5, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A10's general score of 72.3. IPhone XS Max's construction is just a little thinner but somewhat heavier than Samsung Galaxy A10, and both were only released 6 months apart. The iPhone XS Max has a superior processing unit than Galaxy A10, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a 64-bit processor.
Apple iPhone XS Max has a much better looking display than Galaxy A10, because it has a lot better 1242 x 2688 resolution, a quite bigger display and a lot higher pixel count per screen inch. The iPhone XS Max counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A10, because although it has a camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs, a larger aperture to take better low light photos and videos and a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Galaxy A10 has a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A10 counts with a bit better battery duration than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity instead of 3179mAh.
Although Apple iPhone XS Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A10. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A10, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.