Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-19 | 2017-08-03 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Asus ZenFone AR is slightly better than Galaxy A10, with a 77.4 score against 72.3. Despite being the best in this comparison review, it must be noted that it is also older, somewhat thicker and just a little heavier. Asus ZenFone AR counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Asus ZenFone AR has a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better screen density and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Asus ZenFone AR counts with a superior memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A10 counts with just a little better battery performance than Asus ZenFone AR, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. The Asus ZenFone AR counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A10, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light images, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality, a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a lot better (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.