Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-19 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is much better than Galaxy A10, getting an 81.6 score against 72.3. The Google Pixel 2 design has the same thickness than the Galaxy A10, but it's somewhat lighter. The Google Pixel 2 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A10, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 2 also has more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 2 features a brighter screen than Galaxy A10, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1080 x 1920 resolution and a much greater count of pixels per inch of display. The Google Pixel 2 has a bit bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy A10, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel 2 captures a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A10, because although it has a back facing camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy A10 features better battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 2 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.