Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-19 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 is slightly better than Galaxy A10, getting a overall score of 77 against 72.3. LG V20 is an a lot older and a little heavier phone than Galaxy A10, but LG could make it just a bit thinner anyway. LG V20 counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A10, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a way greater display pixel density.
LG V20 features much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage. LG V20 counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy A10, because although it has lesser cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy A10 has a little better battery performance than LG V20, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh. The LG V20 has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a bigger camera sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a larger aperture to capture better images and video in low light environments and a camera with a better resolution.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, LG V20 is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.