Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-19 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V30 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A10, getting a overall score of 79.1 against 72.3. LG V30's body is a little lighter and a little bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A10, even though it was released about a year before. The LG V30 features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30 also has a higher amount of RAM.
LG V30 has a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch in the display and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. LG V30 takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A10, because it has a bigger camera aperture, a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality and a better 16 megapixels resolution camera.
The LG V30 counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A10 counts with just a bit longer battery duration than LG V30, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity.
Although LG V30 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A10. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A10, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.