Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-19 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 151.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus is better than Galaxy A10, getting a general score of 79.7 against 72.3. Motorola Moto G Stylus's design is newer than Galaxy A10's, but it is heavier and somewhat thicker. Both phones we are comparing here have the same Android 11 OS, so both should provide you the same operating system features.
Moto G Stylus counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A10, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Moto G Stylus also has more RAM. Moto G Stylus features a much better looking display than Galaxy A10, because it has more pixels per inch of screen, a much higher 1080 x 2300 pixels resolution and a little bigger display.
Motorola Moto G Stylus features a much greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy A10, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has an 18 percent larger battery capacity.
The Moto G Stylus counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and videos, a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a lot larger sensor and a back camera with a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Although Moto G Stylus is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A10. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Moto G Stylus, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy A10, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.