Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-19 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z4 is better than Galaxy A10, with a 79.8 score against 72.3. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Motorola Moto Z4 has an older 10 version while Galaxy A10 has Android 11. The Motorola Moto Z4 is a a bit lighter and just a bit thinner cellphone than the Galaxy A10, even when both of them were released only a couple of months apart.
Moto Z4 has a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A10, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Moto Z4 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Motorola Moto Z4 counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A10, because it has a little larger screen, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a greater screen pixels density.
The Moto Z4 captures greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a much better 48 MP resolution camera in the back, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a larger aperture and a much better 3840x2160 video quality. The Moto Z4 has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A10, and although they both have an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Moto Z4 also has 128 GB internal storage.
The Moto Z4 has just a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a 3600mAh battery capacity.
Although Moto Z4 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A10. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Moto Z4, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A10, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.