Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-19 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 is better than Galaxy A10, getting an 84.9 score against 72.3. Even being the best we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy A80 body is way heavier and thicker than the Galaxy A10. The Galaxy A80 counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A10, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A80 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A80 counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A10, because it has a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit bigger display and a greater display density. The Samsung Galaxy A80 features a little bit better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A10, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a little better battery duration than Galaxy A10, because it has a 9% larger battery capacity. The Galaxy A80 counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A10, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a lot bigger sensor capturing way better quality photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.