Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 73.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-03-19 | 2018-07-13 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 107.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 271 pixels per inch | 267 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy J7 Star is a little bit better than the Galaxy A10, having a 73.1 score against 72.3. Both devices in this review include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy A10 has Android 11, providing a couple additional features. Even being the best device we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy J7 Star's construction is a little thicker and just a bit heavier than the Galaxy A10.
The Galaxy A10 features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a quite greater pixel count per screen inch, a quite better resolution of 720 x 1520 pixels and a quite larger display. The Galaxy J7 Star features a processor that is just as good as the Galaxy A10 one, both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
Galaxy J7 Star counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A10, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same (Full HD) video definition and a same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy J7 Star also has a larger sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures and a bigger camera aperture for better images and video in low light situations.
The Galaxy A10 counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Star, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A10 also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A10 features just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy J7 Star, because it has a 3 percent bigger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Galaxy J7 Star is also very cheap compared to the other devices, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.