Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-19 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 151.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than Galaxy A10, getting a global score of 77.8 against 72.3. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's body is much newer and much thinner than Galaxy A10's, although it is notably heavier. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version while Galaxy A10 has Android 11.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much sharper display than Galaxy A10, because it has much more pixels per display inch, a much higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a bigger display. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A10, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy A10 has a way better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A10, because it has a bigger camera aperture for better low-light images and videos, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a much bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality and a much more megapixels camera in the back.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better battery duration than Galaxy A10, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 3400mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A10. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A10, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.