Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-19 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has an overall score of 85.5, which is much better than the Galaxy A10's 72.3 overall score. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's design is just a little heavier and somewhat thicker than the Galaxy A10. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A10, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a higher screen density and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2246.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A10, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has 6 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser megapixels, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also counts with a lot better video resolution and a bigger sensor shooting higher quality photos and videos.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A10, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A10. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy A10, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.