Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2019-08-27 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro has a global score of 84.9, which is better than Samsung Galaxy A10s's global score of 73.8. The iPhone 11 Pro has iOS 15.x operating system, while Samsung Galaxy A10s counts with Android 11 operating system. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison, iPhone 11 Pro's body is heavier and just a little thicker than Samsung Galaxy A10s.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro counts with a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and way more pixels per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy A10s has a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
IPhone 11 Pro has a quite better processing power than Galaxy A10s, because although it has less cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor and 2 GB more RAM. The iPhone 11 Pro captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a camera in the back with a lower resolution, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the iPhone 11 Pro also counts with a lot higher video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A10s counts with greater battery duration than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3046mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A10s. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Samsung Galaxy A10s, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.