Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-27 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max is much better than Galaxy A10s, with a global score of 84.5 against 73.8. The iPhone XS Max is an older and somewhat heavier device than Galaxy A10s, but Apple was able to make it a little thinner anyway. IPhone XS Max has an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has a way higher 1242 x 2688 resolution, a bit bigger screen and a much greater display pixel density.
The iPhone XS Max features a superior processor than Galaxy A10s, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU and 2 GB more RAM memory. The Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a less mega-pixels back-facing camera, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Apple iPhone XS Max also counts with a lot higher video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A10s has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A10s features superior battery life than iPhone XS Max, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone XS Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A10s. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy A10s, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.