Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-27 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, getting an 80.3 score against 73.8. Google Nexus 6P's design is a bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A10s, but it is a little bit heavier and was released 4 years before. Google Nexus 6P has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Nexus 6P also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Google Nexus 6P counts with a sharper display than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch of screen and a lot better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Google Nexus 6P features a bit more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy A10s has a bit longer battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 16 percent more battery capacity. The Google Nexus 6P shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a lower 12.3 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light images and video, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video definition.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A10s. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Galaxy A10s, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.