Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-27 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 271 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra has an overall score of 77, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A10s's score of 73.8. HTC U Ultra's body has the same thickness than the Galaxy A10s, but it is just a little heavier. HTC U Ultra features a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with much more pixels per inch in the display and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Galaxy A10s has a little faster processing unit than HTC U Ultra, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores (but slower). HTC U Ultra features a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A10s, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A10s features better battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. HTC U Ultra shoots better videos and photos than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a lesser mega pixels back facing camera, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the HTC U Ultra also counts with a way higher video definition.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A10s. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the HTC U Ultra, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A10s, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.