Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-08-27 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is a lot better than the Galaxy A10s, having a score of 90.5 against 73.8. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G body is somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker than Galaxy A10s. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android OS, and Galaxy A10s works with Android 11 OS.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy A90 5G has a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a better display density and a little bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A90 5G shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light photography and video, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video quality and a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A10s, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.