Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-27 | 2017-09-19 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black, Blue, Pink and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ1 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A10s, with a global score of 78.3 against 73.8. Xperia XZ1's body is just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner than Samsung Galaxy A10s, even though it was released many years before. Xperia XZ1 features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xperia XZ1 also has more RAM memory.
Xperia XZ1 counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better screen pixel density and a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920px. Sony Xperia XZ1 captures better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for taking photographs and videos in low light situations, it also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher 19 mega-pixels resolution and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Sony Xperia XZ1 features a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A10s has a very superior battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ1, because it has a 48% more battery size.
Although Xperia XZ1 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A10s. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Xperia XZ1, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A10s, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.