Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-27 | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia XZ3 is a bit better than the Galaxy A10s, getting a 79.6 score against 73.8. Both devices we are comparing here include Android operating system, but Sony Xperia XZ3 has newer 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy A10s has Android 11. Sony Xperia XZ3 is an older, notably thicker and heavier cellphone than Galaxy A10s.
Sony Xperia XZ3 has a lot better looking display than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 1440 x 2880px resolution and a way better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. The Xperia XZ3 features a quite bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Xperia XZ3 also has 64 GB internal storage.
Xperia XZ3 has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xperia XZ3 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Sony Xperia XZ3 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures and video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy A10s has longer battery lifetime than Xperia XZ3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Xperia XZ3 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A10s. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Galaxy A10s, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.