Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-08-27 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| $ 202.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than Galaxy A10s, with a score of 77.8 against 73.8. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's construction is noticeably newer and way thinner, but also incredibly heavier than the Galaxy A10s. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a newer 14 version and Galaxy A10s has Android 11, so it provides some nice extra features.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has a way higher display pixel density, a lot higher 2200 x 2480px resolution and a larger display. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A10s, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Galaxy A10s features a really superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 14 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A10s, because it has a lot higher video resolution, a bigger aperture and a back camera with way more mega pixels.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A10s. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A10s, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.