Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-08-27 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro has an overall score of 78.8, which is a bit better than Galaxy A10s's overall score of 73.8. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Vivo X60 Pro's body is newer and just a little bit thinner, but just a little heavier than the Galaxy A10s. Vivo X60 Pro features a better performing processing unit than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels, a greater pixel count per screen inch and a little bit larger screen. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the vivo X60 Pro also has a lot higher (4K) video resolution and a camera with much more MP.
Vivo X60 Pro has a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A10s, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. Vivo X60 Pro features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has a 5 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.