Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-02 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 is better than Samsung Galaxy A11, having a global score of 85 against 73.3. Despite of the fact that the iPhone 8 is a lot older than the Samsung Galaxy A11, it's design is lighter and just a little bit thinner. IPhone 8 has a much better screen than Galaxy A11, because although it has a way smaller display and a little lower resolution of 750 x 1334px, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel density.
Apple iPhone 8 features a superior processing unit than Galaxy A11, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone 8 also counts with a 64 bits CPU. Apple iPhone 8 features a much better storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A11, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The iPhone 8 captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A11, because although it has a back camera with a worse 12 mega pixels resolution, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the iPhone 8 also counts with a lot higher (4K) video definition. The Galaxy A11 features a very superior battery duration than iPhone 8, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 1821mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 8 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A11, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A11. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone 8, else you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A11, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.