Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-02 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS Max has a general score of 84.5, which is much better than the Galaxy A11's 73.3 global score. The Apple iPhone XS Max design is a little thinner than Galaxy A11, although it is heavier and was released around a year before. IPhone XS Max features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A11, because it has a lot better quantity of pixels per inch of display, a much better resolution of 1242 x 2688px and a little bit larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A11 counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone XS Max, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. IPhone XS Max features a better performing CPU than Galaxy A11, because although it has lesser CPU cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processor and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A11 has greater battery life than iPhone XS Max, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3179mAh. Apple iPhone XS Max takes better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A11, because although it has a lower 12 mega-pixels resolution camera, and they both have a same size aperture, the Apple iPhone XS Max also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Although iPhone XS Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A11, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A11. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Galaxy A11, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.