Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-02 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is better than the Galaxy A11's 73.3 general score. Both devices we are comparing come with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version and Galaxy A11 has Android 11. Although LG V50 ThinQ is better than the Galaxy A11, we must tell that it is also an older, just a bit heavier and just a little thicker cellphone.
The LG V50 ThinQ features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A11, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy A11, and although they both have a same size screen, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a lot more pixels per inch in the screen.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better memory for apps and games than Galaxy A11, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ's battery duration is just as good as Galaxy A11's battery performance. The LG V50 ThinQ has a better camera than Galaxy A11, because although it has a lesser MP resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video definition and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images and video.
The LG V50 ThinQ costs a lot more money than Galaxy A11, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.