Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-07-02 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a score of 77.9, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A11's overall score of 73.3. Motorola DROID Turbo's design is just a little lighter than Galaxy A11, but it is thicker and was released 6 years before. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola DROID Turbo has a newer 4.4.4 version while Galaxy A11 has Android 11 version, giving some additional features and performance improvements.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a much sharper screen than Galaxy A11, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a lot greater display density. Motorola DROID Turbo has a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A11, because although it has less cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processor and more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A11 counts with a much greater storage to install games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB. Motorola DROID Turbo takes better pictures and videos than Galaxy A11, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low-light photos, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy A11 counts with a bit superior battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Motorola DROID Turbo is also by far the cheapest, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.