Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-02 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 166.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Stylus has a score of 79.7, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A11's general score of 73.3. Both phones in this comparison review include the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding operating system features. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison review, the Moto G Stylus is a thicker and a bit heavier cellphone than the Galaxy A11.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A11, and although they both have a same size display, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2300 pixels and a better display pixel density. Moto G Stylus has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A11, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Moto G Stylus also has more internal storage.
Moto G Stylus features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Moto G Stylus also has more RAM. The Galaxy A11 and the Motorola Moto G Stylus both count with extremely similar batteries performance. The Moto G Stylus counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A11, because it has a way higher resolution camera in the back, a larger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in low-light environments and a way higher video definition.
Although Motorola Moto G Stylus is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A11, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A11. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Galaxy A11, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.