Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-02 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| $ 166.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A11, getting a 77.8 score against 73.3. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's body is a lot newer and extremely thinner, but also heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A11. These phones use Android operating system, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy A11 has Android 11 version.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better looking display than Galaxy A11, because it has a bigger screen, a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a way higher display pixels density. The Galaxy A11 counts with a lot better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A11, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A11, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy A11, because it has a camera with much more megapixels, a larger aperture to take better low light images and video and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A11, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A11. So if you need that extra features, you can buy vivo X Fold 3 Pro, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Galaxy A11, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.