Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.3 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-02 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.42 x 3.00 x 0.31 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 268 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is much better than the Galaxy A11, getting a overall score of 85.5 against 73.3. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's design is older, a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker than the Galaxy A11. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A11, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels quantity in each inch in the display and a lot higher 1080 x 2246 resolution.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A11, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A11, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy A11, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and a less MP back camera, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a battery lifetime that is very similar to Samsung Galaxy A11's battery duration.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is way more expensive than Galaxy A11, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.