Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-12-21 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a score of 93.2, which is better than the Galaxy A12's global score of 80.3. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy A12 counts with Android 10 OS. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max construction is newer and thinner, but also heavier than the Galaxy A12.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A12, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU and a greater amount of RAM memory. The iPhone 13 Pro Max has an incredibly better display than Samsung Galaxy A12, because it has a much better 1284 x 2778 resolution, way more pixels per inch in the screen and a bit larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A12 features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A12 takes just a bit better pictures and videos than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has worse video frame rate and a way tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy A12 also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A12 has just a little better battery duration than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4352mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.