Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-21 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is a bit better than Galaxy A12's 80.3 score. The Apple iPhone X construction is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Galaxy A12, although it was released 3 years before. Apple iPhone X counts with a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A12, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a lot more pixels per display inch.
Apple iPhone X features a little bit better memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A12, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Apple iPhone X counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A12, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and lesser cpu cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy A12 has a really longer battery performance than iPhone X, because it has an 84 percent more battery size. The Samsung Galaxy A12 shoots clearer photographs and videos than iPhone X, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A12 also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.