Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-21 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR has a global score of 82, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A12's general score of 80.3. IPhone XR's design is just a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A12, even though it was released many years before. Apple iPhone XR features a more powerful processor than Galaxy A12, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The iPhone XR has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A12, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel density and a bit higher 828 x 1792px resolution. Galaxy A12 counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than iPhone XR, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A12 also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A12 has a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone XR, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2942mAh. The Galaxy A12 takes just a bit better photos and videos than iPhone XR, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture which is worse for capturing images in low light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Galaxy A12 also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.