Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-21 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A12's 80.3 overall score. The Google Pixel 4 is an older cellphone than Galaxy A12, but it's a little bit thinner and notably lighter anyway. Google Pixel 4 has a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A12, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher 1080 x 2280 resolution and a lot better pixel amount per inch of screen.
Google Pixel 4 counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A12, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A12 has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A12 also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A12 has a way better battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A12 features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A12 also counts with a lot higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.